USPTO serial 77653111
SCRUM FOR SAAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCRUM FOR SAAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Computer hardware and software consulting services; Computer programming and software design; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of office and workplace automation; Customization of computer hardware and software; Customized software development services; Information technology consultation; IT consulting services; Maintenance and updating of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Technical consulting and assistance with computer-based information systems and components; Updating and maintenance of computer software; Updating of computer software for others(Based on Intent to Use) Computer software design; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Computer software development and computer programming development for others; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of identification, support, and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Design, development, and consulting services in the field of home and workplace automation hardware and software; Design, maintenance, development and updating of computer software; Developing and updating computer software; Developing computer software; Development, updating and maintenance of software and data bases; Maintenance and upgrading of computer software; Periodic upgrading of computer software for others; Software authoring; Software design and development; Updating and design of computer software | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |