Drawing for LIVINGREEN

USPTO serial 77657468

LIVINGREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVINGREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth F. Florek

Kenneth F. Florek FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC1156 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, magazines, newsletters and brochures in the field of responsible generation of energy for distribution to community leaders and energy company employeesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 26, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 10, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
May 10, 2010GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
May 10, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Mar 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 26, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 25, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 25, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance