USPTO serial 77660324
WAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4135812Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2012
- Examiner
- IMAM, AMEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Himeji-Shi, Hyogo-Ken, JP
Himeji-Shi, Hyogo-Ken, JP
Himeji-Shi, Hyogo-Ken, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman DENNEMEYER & ASSOCIATES, LLC2 NORTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, SUITE 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | money counting and sorting machines; money counting and sorting machines equipped with safety cashboxes; cash depositor machines; cash dispensers; money handling machines for cashier/vault, namely, money handling machines for counting, sorting, dispensing and processing coins, checks, or banknotes for use by cashiers and that are placed in vaults; cash and/or check management systems comprised of computer hardware, computer programs used for cash and/or check management, and money counting and sorting machines; money exchangers; coin counting and wrapping/packing machines; banknote strapping machines, namely, machines for counting and strapping together predetermined values of banknotes; cash settlement system comprised of computer hardware, computer programs used for cash accounting and settlement, and cash receiving/dispensing apparatus; banknote counting machines; counterfeit false coin detecting machines; banknote checkers in the nature of banknote recognition machines for detecting counterfeit notes; sorting machines for fitness of banknotes, namely, automated paper money sorting machines; cash dispensing machines; cash deposit and/or dispensing machines; coin counting machines; check deposit machines; computer software for cash and/or check management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 19, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 1, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |