USPTO serial 77662855
7 IN 7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 7 IN 7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L. DENNISON Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care, bath and cosmetic products, namely, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, blush, lip liner, brow pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balms, makeup brushes, makeup sponges, makeup puffs, cosmetic and lip color palettes of facial and/or lip colors sold as a unit with or without an applicator, concealers, under-eye concealers, foundations, foundations with sunscreen, combination concealer and foundation, face powder, soaps, bath oil, skin moisturizer, fragrances and perfumes for personal use, deodorants, talcum powder, shampoo, conditioner, hair styling gels and spray, nail polish, skin creams and powders for use as a bronzer, combination blush and bronzer, sun tan lotion, sun screens, facial cleanser and facial toner, body lotion, exfoliants, face creams, and moisturizing oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |