USPTO serial 77664401
THE CUP KAFFEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CUP KAFFEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Johnson
CHRISTOPHER L. JOHNSON THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, LLP8180 S 700 E STE 350SANDY, UT 84070-0561UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee; tea; coffee-based beverages; coffee beans; roasted coffee beans; chocolate; chocolate flavored coffee; iced coffee; coffee capsules filled with coffee | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | café services; coffee-house services; snack-bar services; provision of food, drinks and snacks in cafés | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |