USPTO serial 77664738
VECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Frame
ROBERT C. FRAME NIELDS, LEMACK & FRAME, LLC176 E MAIN ST STE 5WESTBOROUGH, MA 01581-1763UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Mobile rock crushing machines to be tracked or wheeled; mobile screen separators to be tracked or wheeled; material conveyers; vibratory mechanized grizzly feeders; hydraulic excavators; mini hydraulic excavators; wheeled hydraulic excavators; power-operated front shovels; earth moving machines, namely, backhoe loaders; skid steer loaders; construction machines in the nature of compact wheel loaders, wheel loaders and track loaders; integrated machines for carrying pipe and pre-cast structures; earth moving machines, namely, scrapers, track-type tractors, wheel dozers and motor graders; waste compactors; asphalt paving machines; vibratory earth compacting machines; industrial engines; diesel generator sets consisting of diesel-powered generators of electricity; gas generator sets consisting of gas-powered generators of electricity, hydraulic demolition hammers and scrap-handling equipment for use therewith, namely, waste crushing machines, pneumatic hammers, hydro-electric brooms, pneumatic mobile shears, and pulverizers in the nature of grinding machines for concrete and asphalt pavement; attachments for scrap-handling vehicles, namely, grapple buckets and blades for moving earth and loose objects; power-operated lifting and moving equipment for use with demolition machines, namely, forklifts; log loading and unloading machines; agricultural machinery, namely, combines; power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, pipe layers; power mining shovels; waste crushing machines; and structural parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |