USPTO serial 77665138
AUTOCAR WE'VE GOT YOUR BACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOCAR WE'VE GOT YOUR BACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Highland Park, IL
Highland Park, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sanjiv Sarwate
SANJIV SARWATE PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Providing vehicle emergency services, namely, around-the-clock vehicle repair service over the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice, data and images in the field of vehicle diagnostics, repair and maintenance by means of telephone and Internet transmissions; rental of telecommunications equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Providing vehicle emergency services, namely, around-the-clock vehicle diagnostic service over the Internet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |