USPTO serial 77665794
TRUE VODKA CLEAN & SMOOTH IMPORTED FROM LATVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUE VODKA CLEAN & SMOOTH IMPORTED FROM LATVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Carrino
JOHN CARRINO LAW OFFICES OF JOHN CARRINO155 FRANKLIN AVE STE 2NUTLEY, NJ 07110-2986UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Liquor, namely, vodka | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |