USPTO serial 77666038
PROPAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROPAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Dalli, Esq.
KATHRYN DALLI TWOMEY, LATHAM, SHEA, KELLEY, DUBIN ET ALPO BOX 939833 WEST SECOND STREETRIVERHEAD, NY 11901-9398Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Nutritional supplements; Vitamin and mineral supplements; Vitamin supplements excluding pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention of hair loss and promotion of hair growth | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |