USPTO serial 77666489
SAFLEX: THE INVISIBLE DIFFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFLEX: THE INVISIBLE DIFFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. McKie
JOHN E. MCKIE LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vehicle windshields; laminated vehicle windshields, not being flat glass; vehicle windscreens; laminated vehicle windscreens, not being flat glass; vehicle side windows; laminated vehicle side windows, not being flat glass | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Plastic sheet and film for use in lamination of architectural and automotive glass; polyvinyl butyral (PVB) plastic sheet and film for use in making laminated glass; plastic interlayer in the nature of plastic film for industrial use in production of solar cells, and photovoltaic and other solar energy production modules; plastic sheet and film for use in lamination of glass; polyvinyl plastic films for industrial use in the encapsulation of photovoltaic cells and modules; plastic film for use in the production of solar collectors, solar cells, and solar thermal collectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Laminated flat glass; building glass for architectural, construction and building use; principally non-metal windows for use in building; principally non-metal doors for use in building; architectural laminated flat glass for building; laminated safety glass for building purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Semi-finished glass for vehicle windows; semi-finished safety glass for vehicle windows; un-worked or semi-worked glass, not being building glass; laminated flat glass for use in automobiles and not for building | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Solutia Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Solutia Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SAFLEX: THE INVISIBLE DIFFERENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |