USPTO serial 77666680
GROHE ONDUS DIGITECTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GROHE ONDUS DIGITECTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
58675 Hemer, DE
58675 Hemer, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Holt
William H. Holt Law Offices of William H. Holt14584 West Dartmouth AvenueLakewood, CO 80228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrotechnical, electronic, opto-electronic and acoustic equipment for monitoring, controlling and regulating water supply and drainage, treatment, availability, distribution, removal and heating of drinking and commercial water in water conduit installations, containers and sanitary installations, namely, electrically controlled and operated pressure regulators, flow monitors, flow control valves, thermostats and valves; thermostats, thermostat components and thermostat units for cold/hot water mixing valves, fittings and taps; individual and replacement parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting apparatus for bathrooms, washrooms, and mirrors, namely, electric lighting fixtures; water supply equipment, sanitary installations and fittings, namely, bibbs, cocks, traps, drains, spouts, water valves, water mixing valves, water mixers and water faucets, stop valves, self-closing water valves and faucets, bath drains and tub overflows, taps for wash stands, tubs, showers and bidets, showers, shower and tub control valves, hand showers, overhead showers, shower heads, side showers, massage showers, faucet aerators, faucet and shower sprayers, sink strainers, strainers for plumbing drains, single lever and two-handed water mixer faucets, faucet filters, hand shower holders, shower hoses, shower tubes and shower tube connections, shower panels, shower columns, complete shower cubicles; shower sets consisting of hand showers, shower slide bars, and shower hoses, shower head spray nozzles and shower spray heads; shower systems consisting of hand showers, head showers, side showers, control valves, shower holders, and shower hoses; electronic cold water and hot water mixer faucets, plumbing valves, taps, and fittings; and replacement parts for all of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Washroom and bathroom accessories, namely, paper towel holders, towel rings, towel rails, towel bars, soap dispensers, soap dishes, soap holders, toothbrush mugs in the nature of toothbrush holders, holders for toothbrush mugs, drinking glasses; units for storing toilet utensils, namely, toilet brush holder, toilet brushes, toilet sponges; toilet paper holders; small household apparatus and portable containers for household purposes of metal, plastic and wood, not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely, all purpose portable household containers, containers for household or kitchen use; and replacement parts for all of the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GROHE AG
- Other trademarks owned by GROHE AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named GROHE ONDUS DIGITECTURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |