CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VIRTUAL RISK MANAGER

USPTO serial 77666713

VIRTUAL RISK MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3902269Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 4, 2011
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with VIRTUAL RISK MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley U. North, III, Esq.

Brian L. Petrequin, Esq. LECLAIRRYAN16TH FLOORONE RIVERFRONT PLAZA, 1037 RAYMOND BLVD.NEWARK, NJ 07102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing interactive databases in the field of accident prevention, namely, accident insurance underwriting and motor vehicle, liability, property and casualty insurance programs through the use of a global computer information network; providing financial research in the fields of accident prevention, managing, costing, implementing, evaluating and auditing for telematic communication programs and motor vehicle, liability, property and casualty insurance programs, through the use of live consultants and via a global computer information networkSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
041Providing custom writing of texts in the fields of accident prevention, managing, costing, implementing, evaluating and auditing for telematic communication programs and motor vehicle, liability, property and casualty insurance programs, through the use of live consultants and via a global computer information networkSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2017C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 28, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 23, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 4, 2016REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2011R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Dec 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2010CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 8, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance