USPTO serial 77666733
EZ DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4084260Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2012
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EZ DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOUSTON, TX
Benefit International Products, Ltd.
George Town, KY
Other trademarks owned by Benefit International Products, Ltd.
HOUSTON, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen A. Pasulka
KATHLEEN A. PASULKA PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B STREET SUITE 2200SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Toothbrush, namely, for animal use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BENEDENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Benefit International Products, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by BENEDENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BENEDENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named EZ DOG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |