Drawing for LOGO

USPTO serial 77667009

LOGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam Siegartel

Adam Siegartel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel, namely, sweaters, pants, jackets, scarves, t-shirts, headwear and footwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 24, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 19, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 4, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 20, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 19, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 14, 2010RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Jun 24, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
May 6, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 30, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 30, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 15, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 15, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 15, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 17, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 17, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance