USPTO serial 77667009
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Siegartel
Adam Siegartel Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel, namely, sweaters, pants, jackets, scarves, t-shirts, headwear and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |