USPTO serial 77667257
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Fallon, Esq.
Jonathan A. Fallon, Esq. Mandelbaum Salsburg155 Prospect AvenueWest Orange, NJ 07052UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on Intent to Use) Lawn mowers; Power-operated sprayers; Tractor towed agricultural implements, namely, mowers (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Lawn mowers; Power-operated sprayers; Tractor towed agricultural implements, namely, mowers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |