USPTO serial 77667395
SIZZLE & SPICE DBA THE VILLAGE GRILL & RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIZZLE & SPICE DBA THE VILLAGE GRILL & RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NAPERVILLE, IL
NAPERVILLE, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out and delivery featuring Pakistani, Indian, and Middle-Eastern food, all of which is 'halal' | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2011 |
| 039 | Delivery of Pakistani, Indian, and Middle-eastern food, all of which is 'hall,' by restaurants | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2011 |
| 043 | Restaurants; Restaurant services, namely, sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Carry-out restaurants; Restaurants featuring home delivery; Self service restaurants; Take-out restaurant services; all featuring Pakistani, Indian, and Middle-Eastern food, all of which is 'halal' | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIZZLE N SPICE
- Other trademarks owned by SIZZLE N SPICE
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named SIZZLE & SPICE DBA THE VILLAGE GRILL & RESTAURANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PBSR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |