USPTO serial 77668100
PERFECT CAMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3732971Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 29, 2009
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFECT CAMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONG BEACH, CA
LONG BEACH, CA
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Moffatt
MICHAEL J. MOFFATT FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DR FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's lingerie | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTOR, ANN
- Other trademarks owned by VICTOR, ANN
- Other trademarks owned by Ann Victor and Debbie Rubio
- Other trademarks owned by Ann Victor and Debbie Rubio
- Other trademarks owned by Ann Victor and Debbie Rubio
- Other trademarks owned by Ann Victor and Debbie Rubio
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PERFECT CAMI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 9, 2018 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |