USPTO serial 77668588
ORLANDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3902271Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2011
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORLANDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Adhesive bandages; adhesive bandages for skin wounds; adult diapers; surgical bandages; bandages for skin wounds; feminine hygiene pads; gauze; medical plasters; sanitary napkins; incontinence pads; sanitary pads; panty liners; panty shields; premoistened medicated towelettes; premoistened medicated wipes; medical adhesive tape | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Disinfectant dispensers for toilets; disposable sterilization pouches for household purposes and not for medical purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Brooms; feather brooms; hard brooms; rough brooms; shaving brush stands; material for brush-making; clothes brushes; crumb brushes; dishwashing brushes; dusting brushes; floor brushes; horse brushes; mushroom brushes; pot cleaning brushes; scraping brushes; scrubbing brushes; shoe brushes; toilet brushes; mane brushes; brushes for footwear; brushes for parquet floors; brushes for pets; brushes for use on bark of trees; horse brushes of wire; wire brushes, not being machine parts; non electric carpet cleaners; non electric carpet sweepers; pot cleaning brushes; cleaning cloths; cleaning combs; cleaning cotton; cleaning mitts of fabrics; cleaning pads; cleaning rags; cloth for wiping or dusting; clothes drying racks; clothing stretchers; cloths, namely, washing cloths and glossing non abrasive cloths; window dusters; dusting gloves; glass fabrics for industrial use; glove stretchers; gardening gloves; plastic household gloves; polishing gloves; rubber household gloves; household gloves for general use; shaped ironing board covers; mops; polishing leather; pre-moistened towelettes for cleaning; scouring sponges; sponges for household purposes; nonwoven fabric cosmetic not paper wipes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Acrylic fibers; polyester batting; polyester fibers; synthetic fibers; textile fibers; polyester stuffing fibers; textile filaments; wadding not of rubber, paper or plastic for padding and stuffing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 023 | Spun cotton; knitting yarn | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Fabric for boots and shoes; cloth napkins for removing makeup; textile used as lining for clothing; dish cloths; oil cloths; cotton fabric; mattress covers; unfitted fabric furniture covers; gauze fabric; linen lining fabric for shoes; handkerchiefs; textile napkins; polyester fabric; table cloths not of paper; towels; kitchen towels; tea towels; washcloths | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORLANDI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ORLANDI S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ORLANDI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |