USPTO serial 77669980
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vihar R. Patel
ALLISON M CORDER VALAUSKAS CORDER LLC150 SOUTH WACKER STREETSUITE 620CHICAGO, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting in the field of administering and managing clinical research and clinical trials for medical, clinical research organizations, biopharmaceutical, and biotechnology companies to increase patient convenience, participation and retention | ABANDONED | May 1, 2008 |
| 042 | Medical and scientific research, namely, assisting and conducting clinical trials, and compiling of clinical trial data | ABANDONED | May 1, 2008 |
| 044 | Medical evaluation services, namely, assist in functional assessment programs, by collecting and gathering results, data and biological samples for individuals and patients participating in clinical trials for drugs and medical devices; nursing services, phlebotomy services, and testing of blood, fitness and urine of clinical participants, offered in patient's home, doctor's offices, and alternate site venues | ABANDONED | May 1, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |