Drawing for SMI SCHOLASTIC MATH INVENTORY

USPTO serial 77670051

SMI SCHOLASTIC MATH INVENTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMI SCHOLASTIC MATH INVENTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward H. Rosenthal

CAMERON A MYLER FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10022-5754

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Educational computer software featuring instruction in math and user manuals sold therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 19, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 19, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 3, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 19, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
May 5, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
May 5, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
May 5, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Mar 15, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 10, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 20, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 20, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 20, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 19, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 19, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Feb 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance