Drawing for NANOSCISSION

USPTO serial 77670198

NANOSCISSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOSCISSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Dissolving processing equipment machines for chemical processing; material shaping and sizing machines for the manufacture of micron and nano particle compositions, and processing and synthesis of micron and nano particles for commercial purposes onlyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 21, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 25, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Jan 31, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 22, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 22, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 27, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 27, 2010PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
May 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 25, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 25, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance