USPTO serial 77671178
AMERICAN ICON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN ICON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Coats for men and women, men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vest, Men's suits, Crew neck sweaters, mock turle neck sweaters, v-neck sweaters, Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, hats, caps, shirts, swim trunks, tee shirts etc | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |