Drawing for STUDY SMART NOT HARD

USPTO serial 77671247

STUDY SMART NOT HARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STUDY SMART NOT HARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Wiley Horton

JOHN WILEY HORTON PENNINGTON MOORE WILKINSON BELL ET AL215 S MONROE STFL 2TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-1839

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Books, namely, study guidesACTIVEDec 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 23, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 23, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 9, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 22, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Feb 22, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 11, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 11, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 11, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2010CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Dec 12, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 23, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Nov 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 19, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance