USPTO serial 77671449
JOHN SHOPE'S SINISTER INDUSTRIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOHN SHOPE'S SINISTER INDUSTRIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Lahser
ANDREW P LAHSER LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW P LAHSER PLC16824 E AVENUE OF THE FOUNTAINSSUITE 14FOUNTAIN HILLS, AZ 85268-3947Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motorcycles, namely, choppers and baggers; Motorcycle structural parts, namely, choppers and custom baggers structural parts; Parts of motorcycles for choppers and custom baggers, namely, filler panels, floor boards, fenders, windshields, dash panels, fuel tanks, and stretch kits comprised of structural parts to expand motorcycle frames | ACTIVE | May 1, 2009 |
| 037 | Motorcycle customization services, namely, customization of choppers and baggers; vehicle maintenance and repair services, namely, reconditioning of motorcycles in the nature of choppers and baggers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |