USPTO serial 77672183
PLANTTRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANTTRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Hollander, Esq.
SUSAN E HOLLANDER MANNATT PHELPS AND PHILLIPS LLP1001 PAGE MILL ROADBUILDING 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Preparations for controlling or destroying vermin, weeds or pests, namely, pesticides; insecticides; fungicides; herbicides; rodenticides; miticides for domestic and agricultural use; parasiticides; pesticides mixed with fertilizers; herbicides mixed with fertilizers; turf algaecide, turf fungicide, and turf pesticide; animal repellents, insect repellents, insect repellents in topical form; plant protection preparations used to protect plants against diseases and pests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |