Drawing for GUARANTEED VALUE

USPTO serial 77672488

GUARANTEED VALUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3979930Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 21, 2011
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GUARANTEED VALUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Doctrow

Michael A. Doctrow MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK100 PINE STHARRISBURG, PA 17101-1200UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Bacon; chicken; chili; [fish; ]luncheon meatsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 18, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Jun 21, 2020REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Apr 18, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 11, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 7, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 17, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 13, 2016NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 13, 2016C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 13, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 5, 2016E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 5, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 22, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 13, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 13, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 13, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 13, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 13, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jul 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
May 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 4, 2010GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
May 4, 2010GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
May 4, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
May 4, 2010RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS
Apr 28, 2010ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 21, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 21, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 23, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 3, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 13, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 13, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 13, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance