Drawing for SAFESCENTS

USPTO serial 77675119

SAFESCENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAFESCENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Corley

DANIEL CORLEY DANIEL J. CORLEY, ESQ.41 SHAKER RDNEW LONDON, NH 03257-5953UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Aromatherapy oils; Baby oil; Baby oils; Bath oil; Bath oils; Bath oils and bath salts; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Bergamot oil; Body oil; Body oils; Body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Essential oils; Essential oils as perfume for laundry purposes; Essential oils for household use; Essential oils for personal use; Essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products; Food flavorings prepared from essential oils; Fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrance; Fragrances; Fragrances and perfumery; Fragrances for automobiles; Fragrances for personal use; Grape seed oil for cosmetic use; Hair care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Japanese hair fixing oil (bintsuke-abura); Jasmine oil for personal use; Massage oils; Natural essential oils; Non-medicated cosmetic skin care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Oils for perfumes and scents; Oils for toiletry purposes; Peppermint oil; Perfume oils; Perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; Pet fragrances; Pre-scented strips and cards for sampling fragrances; Room fragrance refills for non-electric room fragrance dispensers; Room fragrances; Rose oil for cosmetic purposes; Sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; Scented oils used to produce aromas when heated; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Sun tan oil; Sun-tanning oils; Sun-tanning oils and lotions; Suntan oils for cosmetic purposes; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils; Tanning oilsACTIVEFeb 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 25, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Feb 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance