Drawing for FLEXSOURCE

USPTO serial 77676628

FLEXSOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXSOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joi A. White

Joi A. White CARR & FERRELL LLP120 CONSTITUTION DRIVEMENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Refurbishing and remanufacturing of computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals and electronicsACTIVE
039Supply chain, logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of computers, computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and electronics for others by air, rail, ship or truck; transport of goods; delivery of goods; packaging of goods and re-packaging of goods for transportation; storage of goods; warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution, pick-up, packing, and shipping of computers, computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and electronics; warehouse storage services; transportation of goods; shipping of goods; merchandise packaging for others; packaging articles to the order and specification of others; warehousing servicesACTIVE
040assembly of products for others; technical support services, namely, providing technical advice related to the manufacture of computers, computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and electronics; printing servicesACTIVE
042technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; computer technology support services, namely, help desk servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Oct 17, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 17, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jun 11, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 11, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 11, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Dec 13, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 21, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 19, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 19, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 19, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 19, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 8, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 18, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Feb 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 2, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 18, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 23, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 27, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Feb 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance