USPTO serial 77681220
ALX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Scientific and technological apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, uniforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2012 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |