USPTO serial 77691070
MINDLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINDLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy L. Brosius
AMY L. BROSIUS FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | information regarding weight loss and healthy eating | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |