Drawing for KATAPULT

USPTO serial 77695514

KATAPULT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KATAPULT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth L. Tolar

2908 HESSMER AVE STE 2METAIRIE, LA 70002-5847UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028athletic equipment, namely, a specially-designed athletic shoe having a wide-profile, spaced platform depending from a portion of the sole for use with a customized training program to enhance strength, speed, agility and balanceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 28, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 28, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 13, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 13, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 13, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 13, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 25, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance