USPTO serial 77696455
SEARCHABILITY INDEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3858461Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2010
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEARCHABILITY INDEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Sharrow
DAVID P. SHARROW LAW COOPERATIVE LLC76 SUNSET RDCARLISLE, MA 01741-1306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Audit services in the field of information technology and internet-related services, namely, business auditing; business consulting services in the field of information technology, intranets, extranets, database design and development, data searching, data storage, data retrieval, and web site design and development; providing an online directory and ranking of the effectiveness of businesses' information technologies, intranets, extranets, databases, data searching, data storage, data retrieval, and web sites, namely, providing an on-line commercial information directory on the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2009 |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of information technology and internet services, namely, computer hardware, database development and software consulting services; accreditation services, namely, developing, evaluating and testing standards for information technologies, intranets, extranets, databases, data searching, data storage, data retrieval, and web sites for the purposes of accreditation; accreditation services, namely, evaluating organizations to determine to what extent organizations conform to established standards; providing technical indices in the nature of quantitative measurements for analyzing the effectiveness of information technologies, intranets, extranets, databases, data searching, data storage, data retrieval, and web sites in the nature of computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |