Drawing for INTELLAFLEX

USPTO serial 77701414

INTELLAFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLAFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALLISON BRENNAN

ALLISON BRENNAN BUCKLEY LECHEVALLIER P.C.THREE CENTERPOINTE DRIVESUITE 250LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer network hardware and equipment for managing ethernet connectionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 28, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 8, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 26, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 17, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 2, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 2, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 27, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 2, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 1, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 31, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance