Drawing for GET IN THE GAME, BET IN THE GAME

USPTO serial 77703791

GET IN THE GAME, BET IN THE GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GET IN THE GAME, BET IN THE GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Vogel

Jason M. Vogel Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasThe Grace BuildingNew York, NY 10036-7703

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming and gambling machines, mobile and wireless gaming and gambling machines for use with audio visual displays; computer hardware and software for wireless gaming, gambling and wagering; apparatus for wireless transmission and reception of gaming, gambling and wagering dataACTIVE
042Design, development and maintenance of computer software; development of computer hardware; design and development of electronic gaming, gambling and wagering systems; providing on-line non-downloadable software for displaying, soliciting, accepting, reporting and recapping offerings and wagers related to activity during an event including sporting and race events in the fields of gaming, gambling and wageringACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 9, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 7, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Dec 13, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 13, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 12, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 11, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
May 14, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED
May 13, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 13, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 11, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 11, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 11, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
May 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Nov 19, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 19, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 10, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance