USPTO serial 77703901
FLSA UNIVERSAL FIRE SPRINKLER CORPORATION ISO 9001: 2000 CERTIFIED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLSA UNIVERSAL FIRE SPRINKLER CORPORATION ISO 9001: 2000 CERTIFIED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John B. Farmer
JOHN B. FARMER LEADING-EDGE LAW GROUP, PLC1051 E CARY ST STE 1130RICHMOND, VA 23219-4029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Servicing of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training regarding fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Testing of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Inspection for safety purposes of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Monitoring of fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems; Consulting regarding fire protection systems, fire detection systems, fire alarm systems, special hazard systems, fire suppression systems, special hazard suppression systems, fire sprinkler systems, and electronic security systems for buildings, namely, access-control systems and anti-burglary systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLSA HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FLSA HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ECFP Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named FLSA UNIVERSAL FIRE SPRINKLER CORPORATION ISO 9001: 2000 CERTIFIED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |