USPTO serial 77704786
HAIDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAIDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Trisha A. Dore
TRISHA A. DORE ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LLP401 WEST GEORGIA STREETSUITE 702VANCOUVER, BC, V6B5A1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Tote bags, handbags, suitcases, wallets, purses, briefcases, school bags, handbags for men, trunks for travel, parasols, patio umbrellas, umbrellas, walking sticks, harnesses and saddle | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Formal, casual and athletic clothing articles for men, women and children, namely, lounge wear, sleep wear, rainwear, shirts, blouses, skirts, coats, trousers, pants, vests, jerseys, pajamas, socks and stockings, singlets, corsets, garters, underpants, petticoats, hats, headscarves, neckties, raincoats, overcoats, greatcoats, bathing suits, sports overalls, wind resistant jackets, ski pants, belts, fur coats, scarves, gloves, dressing gowns; footwear, namely, shoes, sports shoes, slippers and boots | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |