Drawing for DC POWER SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 77706869

DC POWER SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DC POWER SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Warren L. Dranit

Warren L. Dranit Spaulding McCullough & Tansil LLPP.O. Box 1867Santa Rosa, CA 95402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale distributorship featuring photovoltaic panels and solar power systems; business referral services, namely, referrals in the field of solar energy servicesACTIVE—
036Financing of the design, purchase and installation of solar power systems for othersACTIVE—
037Solar power services, namely, technical consultation in the field of installation of solar energy technology, engineering services, design for others in the field of solar power systemsACTIVE—
040Technical consultation in the field of generation and production of solar energyACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops in the fields of operation, management, marketing and branding of solar power system dealershipsACTIVE—
042Solar power services, namely, technical consultation in the field of design and development of solar energy technology, engineering services, design for others in the field of solar power systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 2, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 23, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance