USPTO serial 77706934
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel E. Engel III
Joel E. Engel III WOODS FULLER SHULTZ & SMITH PC300 SOUTH PHILLIPS AVESUITE 300SIOUX FALLS, SD 57117-5027| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | [Coats; hats; ]shirts | ACTIVE | Jun 20, 2011 |
| 035 | [Advertising and commercial information services, via the Internet; advertising services, namely, promoting properties for sale by owner via the Internet; advertising via electronic media and specifically the Internet; advice and information about customer services and product management and prices on Internet sites in connection with purchases made over the Internet; an interactive web site for users to review and rate Internet content, people, companies, products and/or services utilizing a software application to award points whereby web site users are eligible to exchange points earned for promotional items consisting of coupons, rebates, discounts or special offerings on goods and/or service provided by web site sponsors; compilation of advertisements for use as web pages on the Internet; computer services, namely, address change notification services in the nature of posting notifications of changes of addresses for businesses via the Internet; design of Internet advertising; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line communications network on the Internet; dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; facilitating the exchange of needed information for financial compensation via the Internet; information management services, namely, shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, tracking documents, packages and freight over computer networks, intranets and inter nets; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to business and management or business administration, including such services provided on line or via the Internet; insurance lead collection and matching services, namely, matching consumer requests for insurance policy quotes collected over the Internet to pre-qualified insurance brokers, agents and agencies interested in those requests; Internet advertising services; market manipulation, research and analysis, whether or not via the Internet; on-line business research service that allows the user to analyze opinion trends contained in documents on the Internet; on-line trading services in which seller posts products to be auctioned and bidding is done via the Internet; organisation of Internet auctions; providing a searchable Internet database of potential home buyers with the purpose of matching home buyers with home sellers; providing a searchable online advertising guide featuring the goods and services of other on-line vendors on the Internet; providing a secured access database via the Internet through which documents and images can be viewed, copied, and printed for purposes of conducting corporate transactions; providing an Internet web site for classified advertising to buy and sell Ukrainian related wares, art, antiques, books, embroidery, costumes, collectibles, instruments, memorabilia and other one-of-a-kind items; providing an Internet web site to advertise services of interest to the Ukrainian community in the United States of America and Canada and to advertise services provided by individuals of Ukrainian origin; providing an Internet web site to promote events relating to the Ukrainian community in the United States of America and Canada by means of an online events calendar; providing an Internet website featuring news and information in the field of national and international politics; Providing an Internet website portal featuring links to music-related merchandise for retail purposes; Providing an Internet-based database of patient medical information designed to facilitate patient-authorized, HIPAA-compliant sharing and maintenance of patient medical information amongst a patient's doctors such that this information can be directly inserted into the doctor's medical reports as a means of increasing medical record generation efficiency and accuracy; providing an on-line commercial information directory on the Internet; providing and rental of advertising space on the Internet; providing business information, also via Internet, the cable network or other forms of data transfer; providing consumer product information via the Internet; providing information about automobiles for sale by means of the Internet; providing information in the field of aviation fuel management via the Internet, namely, the amount of fuel loaded onto aircraft and maintaining operational control of fuel available and delivered to aircraft; providing information in the field of marketing and on-line marketing media via the Internet; providing information pertaining to procurement, buying, selling and tendering information and opportunities relating to goods, services, and construction via computer, computer networks, telephone, the Internet or electronic mail; reseller services, namely, distributorship services in the field of cable and DSL television and Internet entertainment products and services; Subscription to a telematics, telephone or computer service; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods and services, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods and services from an Internet web site particularly specializing in the marketing of the sale of goods and services of others] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 20, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | 15AB | AFFIDAVIT UNDER SECT 15 ABANDONED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 24, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |