USPTO serial 77708418
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Charleston, WV
Charleston, WV
Charleston, WV
Chicago, IL
Vellmar, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP901 New York Avenue NWWashington, DC 20001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Filters of steel and stainless steel featuring the following types of filter media: stainless steel wire meshes, stainless steel non-wovens, polyethylene non-wovens, polyethylene terephthalate non-wovens, glass fiber non-wovens, laminated wire meshes, and slotted tubes, all of the aforementioned filters used for removing particles from liquids and gases in mechanical applications, namely, back flush filters, high and low pressure filters, oil and emulsion filters, bypass filters, oil filters for motors and engines, fuel filters, filters and purifiers for machines, sub-micron fuel filters for diesel exhaust, all of the aforementioned filters for use with the following types of machines: with chemical industry machines, namely, machines used in the production of synthetic non-wovens; with pharmaceutical industry machines, namely dryers and coating systems, and grinders for drug production; with polymer industry machines, namely heaters for injection moulding, injection moulding machines, polymer melt in plastic production machines, polymer extruders, and fiber and film production machines; with engineering industry machines, namely, large color format printers, hydraulic work holding equipment, and machines for processing cooling lubricants; with rotary equipment, namely gas turbines; with chipping machines and machines used for cleaning of isolators for high voltage cables; with automotive industry machines, namely with EGR systems for automobile engines, with braking systems, with CNG refuelling systems, with racing systems, with urea refuelling stations, with vehicle hydrogen refuelling systems, and with gas conditioning machines in exhaust gas analysis systems; with aircraft industry machines, namely fuel filters for liquid-propellant rockets; for mining industry machines, namely filters for hydraulic circuits in underground mining applications, namely hydraulic roof support shields, shearers, for filtration of hydraulic fluids and coolants, and for spray fluid filtration for dedusting machines; Filter components and filter elements of steel and stainless steel, namely leaf discs, pleated or non-pleated filter candles, welded or bonded filter candles, filter cartridges, filter housings for filtering liquids and gases which are used in connection with aforesaid filters | ACTIVE | Oct 16, 2003 |
| 011 | Filters of steel and stainless steel for removing particles from liquids in industrial applications with filter media, namely, stainless steel wire meshes, stainless steel non-wovens, polyethylene non-wovens, polyethylene terephthalate non-wovens and glassfiber non-wovens, laminated wire meshes, slotted tubes for the chemical industry, pharmaceutical industry, the polymer industry, engineering and mining , namely, water filters, inline filters, back flush filters, water purification filters, sedimentation and filtration apparatus for clarification, thickening and filtration of water, waste water and industrial water; filters of steel and stainless steel for removing particles from liquids with the aforesaid media in all industrial water applications in the nature of water treatment equipment, namely, cartridge filtration units and reverse osmosis filtration units; filters of steel and stainless steel for removing particles from liquids for the food and beverage industry, namely, for water treatment plants for beverages including beer and soft drinks; filters of steel and stainless steel for removing particles from liquids for systems for filtration of beer, wine and fruit juice; filters of steel and stainless steel for removing particles from liquids for ground water processing for production of emulsions for water hydraulics in underground mining, air filters of steel and stainless steel for industrial installations, filters and filtering devices for air and gas conditioning; Filter components and filter elements of steel and stainless steel namely, leaf discs, pleated or non-pleated filter candles, welded or bonded filter candles, filter cartridges, filter housings, and filter elements for oilfield water injection; all the above mentioned filter components and filter elements for filtering water, liquids and gases which are used in connection with aforesaid filters | ACTIVE | Oct 16, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 17, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 30, 2023 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Nov 10, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | PUMI | PROOF OF USE INTERIM ACTION ISSUED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |