Drawing for REEL ARCADE

USPTO serial 77711772

REEL ARCADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REEL ARCADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Josephs

DAVID R. JOSEPHS BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES, LTD.101 DYER ST FL 5PROVIDENCE, RI 02903-3926UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009(Based on Intent to Use) Computer game software for gaming machines including slot machines or video lottery terminals; Gaming machines including slot machines or video lottery terminals(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Computer game software for gaming machines including slot machines or video lottery terminals; Gaming machines including slot machines or video lottery terminalsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 3, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 2, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 22, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 5, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jun 22, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 21, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 15, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 15, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 15, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 24, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Dec 2, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 2, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 2, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance