USPTO serial 77711826
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Elk Grove Village, IL
Elk Grove Village, IL
Elk Grove Village, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Bostjancich
JOHN BOSTJANCICH SMART & BOSTJANCICH30 W MONROE ST STE 800CHICAGO, IL 60603-2424UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Integrated materials handling systems and equipment comprised of one or more of the following: conveyors, sortation equipment in the nature of trap arm, pusher, bow arm, flat face arm, pop-up wheel, line, sliding shoe and multi-belt sortation conveyors to merge, sort, discharge, divert and move cartons or product; directed picking systems comprised of unit load and/or mini-load automated storage and retrieval machinery, carousels, carton flow racks, pick-to-light, put-to-light and other pick structures in the nature of pick modules and machinery to retrieve items or packages, together with operational software, hardware and operators' consoles comprising a computer monitor and/or electrical control panel all sold as a unit with the system; electrical and pneumatic equipment in the nature of robotic material handling machinery, namely, robotic palletizers and robotic truck loaders for automatic and semi-automatic stacking of cartons and product on pallets and for automatic and semi-automatic loading of cartons and product into trucks; and structural parts for the foregoing, namely, metal storage racks and mezzanines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2009 |
| 009 | Warehouse control systems comprised of programmable logic controllers (PLC) and personal computers (PC) and related operational software, including proprietary PLC to PC interface, and hardware sold as a unit with the system; operators' consoles comprising a computer monitor and/or electric control panel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 2, 2009 |
| 037 | Installation, inspection, service, maintenance and repair of material handling systems and equipment; technical support services in the nature of technical advice related to all of the foregoing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 30, 2009 |
| 042 | Engineering, design and testing for others of material handling systems and equipment; inspection of material handling systems and equipment; technical support services in the nature of technical advice related to the inspection of material handling systems and equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |