CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for H-E-B SNAX SWEET & SPICY PARTY TRAY

USPTO serial 77713179

H-E-B SNAX SWEET & SPICY PARTY TRAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with H-E-B SNAX SWEET & SPICY PARTY TRAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherri L. Eastley

Alice H. Roskin HEB Grocery Company LP646 S. MainSan Antonio, TX 78204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Pre-made party trays and snack trays consisting of trail mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts, candied nuts, seasoned nuts and processed pumpkin seeds, and also including sesame sticks, toasted corn, corn nuggets, pretzels, rice crackers, chocolate covered raisins, yogurt covered nuts, peanut brittle and chocolate covered nutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 31, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 31, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 1, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance