Drawing for DRYMAXX

USPTO serial 77714831

DRYMAXX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRYMAXX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

SCOTT S. HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing; footwear; headgearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 2, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 1, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 19, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance