Drawing for SUITE AND SIMPLE

USPTO serial 77716120

SUITE AND SIMPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUITE AND SIMPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLC2300 N. St., N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Bathroom accessories and hardware, namely, faucets, light fixtures, sinks, toilet bowls, electric light bulbsACTIVE
019Building materials for bathrooms, namely, non-metal countertops for further installationACTIVE
020Bathroom accessories and hardware, namely, cabinets, furniture, shelving, shower rods, mirrors, vanities, towel shelves, non-metal robe hooks, cabinet hardware in the nature of drawer slides, towel holders in the nature of non-metal hooks, and towel valets in the nature of towel racks and standsACTIVE
021Bathroom accessories and hardware, namely, towel bars, towel rings, soap dishes, toothbrush holders, tumblers, tumbler holder, towel holders in the nature of towel bars, shower baskets and holders used as caddies, and plastic storage baskets for household useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 26, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 26, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 25, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 25, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance