USPTO serial 77716855
PIZZA D'LIGHT A SMILE IN EVERY BITE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4181191Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2012
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PIZZA D'LIGHT A SMILE IN EVERY BITE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Bay Village, FL
North Bay Village, FL
North Bay Village, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANCISCO J. FERREIRO
OLIVER ALAN RUIZ MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW THIRD AVENUEHISTORIC CORAL WAYMIAMI, FL 33129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |