USPTO serial 77717219
COUNTRY FRESH OVENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUNTRY FRESH OVENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Biscuits; breakfast burritos; brownies; cakes; cookies; Danish pastries; donuts; English muffins; hamburger sandwiches; hot dog sandwiches; muffins; sandwiches; sandwiches, namely, breakfast sandwiches and wraps, and cheeseburgers | ACTIVE | Jan 13, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |