USPTO serial 77722146
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CELLULAR TELEPHONES; PORTABLE TELEPHONES; PORTABLE COMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, NAMELY, PORTABLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTANT MESSAGING DEVICES; MOBILE TELEPHONES; DEVICES FOR HANDS-FREE USE OF MOBILE PHONES; MOBILE PHONE CAMERA; FLASH LAMPS; VIEWFINDER FOR MOBILE PHONE CAMERA; SHUTTER FOR MOBILE PHONE CAMERA; SHUTTER RELEASE FOR MOBILE PHONE CAMERA; IRIS, NAMELY, RECOGNITION SECURITY DEVICE FOR MOBILE PHONE CAMERA; TILTING HEAD FOR MOBILE PHONE CAMERA; FLASH GUN FOR MOBILE PHONE CAMERA; SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS; APPARATUS FOR REMOTE CALLING DETECTION OF MOBILE PHONE, NAMELY, MOBILE PHONE USAGE DETECTION SYSTEM COMPRISING A CAMERA AND A MOBILE PHONE SIGNAL RECEIVING DEVICE; REMOTE CONTROL APPARATUS, NAMELY, REMOTE CONTROLS FOR CAMERAS; REMOTE CONTROL TELEMETERING MACHINES AND APPARATUS; MOVABLE SAFETY APPARATUS, NAMELY, FLASHING SAFETY LIGHTS; CIRCUIT OVERLOAD PROTECTORS, RADIOTELEPHONY SETS; GAS LEAK ALARMS; FIRE ALARMS; SIGNAL BELLS; BURGLAR ALARMS; ANTI-THEFT ALARM APPARATUS, NAMELY, THEFT ALARMS NOT FOR VEHICLES; ANTI-THEFT WARNING APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC WARNING LIGHTS AND HORN; FLAME TEMPERATURE SENSORS; SIRENS; SMOKE SENSORS; SMOKE DETECTORS; HEAT SENSORS; ACOUSTIC ALARMS; ALARMS FOR THE DETECTION OF INFLAMMABLE GASES; ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC BURGLAR ALARMS; ALARM BELLS, ELECTRIC CABLES; THEFT PREVENTION INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, MOTION SENSITIVE SECURITY LIGHTS; FIRE ALARMS; ELECTRIC DOOR BELLS, ELECTRONIC THEFT PREVENTION APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MOTION DETECTORS; DOOR PHONE; VIDEO TELEPHONES; INTERPHONES; DNA CHIPS; ELECTRIC LOCKS; APPARATUS FOR ANALYSING GASES, NAMELY, GAS METERS; OPTICAL MIRRORS FOR INSPECTING WORK; PLATE CAMERAS; THEATRE GLASSES; ADDING MACHINES; PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PERSONAL USE AGAINST ACCIDENTS, NAMELY, GLOVES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENTS; SAFETY TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR FOREST FIRE EXTINGUISHMENT; METAL DETECTORS; VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE; DIGITAL CAMERAS; PORTABLE VIDEO CAMERAS WITH BUILT-IN VIDEOCASSETTE RECORDERS; VIDEO CAMERAS; GOGGLES FOR SPORTS; TELEVISION APPARATUS, NAMELY, TELEVISION MONITORS; PORTABLE WIRELESS INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, NAMELY, USB HARDWARE; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS; COMPUTERS; MULTIPLE PURPOSE CAMERAS; TV CAMERAS; VIDEO TRANSMISSION APPARATUS; INFRARED CAMERAS; CLOSED CIRCUIT TV; DVR, NAMELY, DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDER; PHOTOTELEGRAPHY APPARATUS; INTERCOMS | ACTIVE | Apr 25, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |