USPTO serial 77722235
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Mortgage foreclosure mitigation and loan default mitigation services, namely, providing a web-based database for purchasing and selling real estate for others; On-line real estate investment services in the nature of purchasing and selling real estate for others; Facilitating and arranging for real estate procurement for others | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |