Drawing for SHOPPERTUNITIES

USPTO serial 77722532

SHOPPERTUNITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOPPERTUNITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Wiley Horton

JOHN WILEY HORTON PENNINGTON, MOORE, WILKINSON, BELL & DUN215 S MONROE ST FL 2TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301-1839UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketing services in the field of retail products and retail stores of othersACTIVEFeb 3, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 13, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 28, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 13, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 6, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 6, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance