USPTO serial 77722672
ECHO POINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECHO POINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Mueller
JOHN M MUELLER TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP425 WALNUT STREETSUITE 1800CINCINNATI, OH 45202-3957Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Potpourri | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 004 | Candles | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 008 | silverware, namely, forks, knives, and spoons | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 011 | Lamps | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 014 | clocks, jewelry boxes | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 020 | picture frames, pillows, foot stools, furniture | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 021 | bowls; baskets made of rattan, bamboo, sea grass, and banana leaves | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 024 | comforters, curtains | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
| 027 | rugs | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Consolidated Property Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Consolidated Property Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named ECHO POINT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |